About Us
Home
Mr.Trivedi's Physiology>
Human Wellness>
Transcendental Genetics >
Transcendental Science>
Microbiology>
Agriculture>
Publications>

Events
Gallery>
Volunteer
Donate
Newsletters>
Careers
Newsroom>

 
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon
For Email Marketing you can trust










Microbiology


Mr. Trivedi designed projects to observe the impact of his thought transmission on pathogenic bacteria, fungi, viruses and Tuberculosis strains which include:

 
1) Tuberculosis strains: 30 XDR (Extensively Drug Resistant), 9 MDR (Multi drug resistant) & 2 ATCC (American Type Culture Collection) mycobacterial strains
   
2) Multiple Drug Resistant (MDR) & Extensively Drug Resistant (XDR) bacterial strains - 63 samples in the revived state.
 
3) Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) - 31 samples as viral loads in human blood plasma
Hepatitis 'C' Virus (HCV) - 30 samples as plasma viral loads, as above
Hepatitis 'B' virus (HBV) - 31 samples as above
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) - 05 samples as above
 
4) 39 ATCC (American Type Culture Collection) Bacterial and Fungal strains in both revived and lyophilized state. In the lyophilized state, the strains are in a dehydrated and powdered form, which is a stable state used for transportation. Because such strains multiply only in the liquid culture medium, no changes can occur in this state and the particular strain contained in the sealed packages shipped by the vendor are certified by the ATCC.
   
5) 10 ATCC strains (see descriptions above) treated only in the lyophilized state, a stable state where variations cannot occur spontaneously under normal conditions.
 

The above projects took place in a laboratory accredited by The College of American Pathologists, namely, the Microbiology Laboratory of P.D. Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, India.

Machine Error

Results are summarized below and links are provided to copies of original reports. A major question which comes up is: could this be machine error or experimental error? This is a question which needs to be answered.

All the methods used are rigorous as per accepted standards, accepted in publications in the best journals; therefore doubts come up only because of the controversial and unprecedented nature of the results. However, in the current case it is necessary to examine this question further. What is the level of machine error in these procedures? Could the changes be a result of some electromagnetic or other interference rather than an impact on the sample? A large number of experiments have been conducted by various laboratories around the world to test the calibration accuracies of instruments, by trying repeat scans of the same sample. They have found that misidentifications and machine errors do come up; however such errors are normally seen in the range of 3%-8% and the Microscan Walkaway performs well in such tests with accuracy upwards of 97%. If it had a low accuracy, it would not be accepted as an industrially viable instrument. Certainly these instruments, routinely used for pathological tests in hospitals, do not give inaccuracies in 90% of the samples, whereas results described below, performed on close to 250 different samples, do show such sustained and consistent changes, which are also confirmed and supported by other tests performed in independent laboratories around the world, and described here in related sections.

Results

Bacterial and Fungal strains are characterized by their biochemical reactions and susceptibility to antibiotics. The characterization specifies a genotype and a particular variation within the genotype, the phenotype, with each genotype-phenotype combination being given a unique number called a Biotype number. Changes found after the Trivedi treatment included highly resistant bacteria becoming susceptible to drugs or even becoming non-viable outright and genetic level changes resulting in alteration in Biotype number up to change in the species itself.

Of the selected Tuberculosis strains, some were highly resistant to antibiotics while others were either intermediate or fully susceptible. The objective of the treatment was to create a measurable alteration in the characteristics, in any direction different from their original value. Approximately 89% of the samples showed significant changes in antibiotic sensitivities, with strains becoming resistant, intermediate or susceptible to antibiotics, different from their original characteristics. In the cultures, 8 treated isolates in fact showed no growth whatsoever, having apparently lost their viability altogether. Further descriptions and reports may be seen by clicking here

90% of the tested Bacterial and Fungal samples showed changed biochemical reactions, with up to 65% alterations in the reactions of each. These changes were sufficient in over 65% cases to result in a changed identification of the sample (i.e. changed Biotype number) not only with changes in their phenotype but including 27% which were also being large enough to produce a clear change in the species (genotype) itself. As explained above, no changes can normally spontaneously occur in the lyophilized state, which is a safe state used for transportation of the samples and certified by the company. However, similar results were also seen in samples when treated directly in the lyophilized state, with over 65% showing changes sufficient to result in a new Biotype number which included over 31% showing clear changes in species. Details of the experiments and links to reports are available here

A separate series of tests conducted directly on lyophilized bacteria only, observed the effect over two treatments and for more than 160 days after revival (see explanation of lyophilized above). Fluctuations in biotype number were observed in 90% cases with 80% resulting in new biotype, including 40% in new genotypes. The report may be seen here

 
Experiments on the Viruses looked for change in concentrations of virus in plasma, i.e. plasma viral load. The treatment was able to achieve both increases as well as decreases in the viral load. Many changes had a value well over 0. 5 log, which is considered a clinically significant change for a drug. No drug has yet been found which can change the loads in such a short period to these levels of significance.

The decreases in the viral load in plasma can be interpreted as a lethal and specific energy transfer of some kind, but the increases in the load are harder to explain. Viruses are bits of genetic code which cannot multiply on their own. A virus is able to replicate only after penetrating a host cell to capture its protein-making factory and make use of its energy-generating mechanisms. The plasma medium, however, contains no such host cells and is therefore a completely dormant state for them. This effect makes it possible that the impact is at a different level rather than at the level of any particular mechanism.

Full experimental details as well as detailed reports may be seen for the experiment on viruses at this link

   
 
 
 NEXT : BACTERIOLOGY
 
 
 
Next page
 Top Next page

             

Bacteriology    |    Virology    |    Mycobacteriology    |